Honest comparison

In-house or agency? Run the real number.

The comparison people make is salary against retainer, and it's the wrong one. One marketer covers one or two disciplines. The honest comparison is a salary plus tools plus ramp time against a team that covers every channel from day one.

The short answer

An in-house marketer costs meaningfully more than their salary — add employer contributions, software, recruitment and three to six months of ramp before the role produces at full strength. In exchange you get someone whose whole attention is on your business, which is genuinely valuable. The break-even is about breadth: if you need one or two disciplines run deeply and continuously, hire. If you need six disciplines run competently, one hire cannot cover them and an agency is cheaper than the three or four people who could. Many businesses end up doing both — one in-house owner of the brand, an agency executing the channels.

Side by side

Where each one actually wins.

Eight criteria, marked honestly. We lose some of these, which is the only reason the rest are worth reading.

Real annual cost

An in-house hire

Salary plus contributions, tools, recruitment.

An agency retainer

The retainer. Tools and software included.

Time to full output

An in-house hire

Three to six months of hiring and ramp.

An agency retainer

Running inside the first month.

Disciplines covered

An in-house hire

One deeply, maybe two adequately.

An agency retainer

Every channel, a specialist on each.

Attention on your business

An in-house hire

Total. It's the whole job.

An agency retainer

Shared with other clients.

Institutional knowledge

An in-house hire

=Deep, and it walks out if they leave.

An agency retainer

=Documented, and survives staff changes.

Flexibility to change scope

An in-house hire

Low. Changing scope means changing staff.

An agency retainer

High. Scope moves month to month.

Cost to stop

An in-house hire

Notice period, severance, difficult.

An agency retainer

Notice on the contract.

Being in the room

An in-house hire

Present for every internal conversation.

An agency retainer

Needs deliberate access to stay close.

Hire in-house when

  • One or two channels carry the majority of your revenue.
  • The work needs someone in daily internal conversations.
  • You already have a senior marketer who can hire and manage them.
  • Volume in that one discipline genuinely fills a full week.

Use an agency when

  • You need several channels running at once, competently.
  • You need output this quarter rather than after a hiring round.
  • Nobody internally can judge or manage a marketing hire.
  • Scope is likely to shift as you learn what works.

Before you decide

The questions worth asking.

Anything not covered here, ask on the call — we'd rather answer it before you spend money than after.

Book the call

Take the salary and add employer contributions, software licences, recruitment fees and the productivity gap during ramp. The fully-loaded figure is typically well above the headline salary. None of that makes hiring wrong — it just means the honest comparison is that number, not the salary alone.

Clickbrand

Want the number for your situation?

Bring your channel list to a free 30-minute call and we'll work through what a hire would have to cover versus what a retainer would.

Start with a hello.

Project enquiry

Where do we send our answer?

About a minute. No spam, ever.

Let's connect